deckardcanine: (Default)
[personal profile] deckardcanine
Take a close look at this rather long sentence devoid of punctuation and search your memory very carefully before you decide whether it technically qualifies as a genuine run-on sentence.

That's right, it doesn't. But the previous sentence does.
Date: Saturday, 13 October 2007 12:58 am (UTC)

carlfoxmarten: (Default)
From: [personal profile] carlfoxmarten
Have you been reading "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" again?

Or just a book on grammar?
Date: Saturday, 13 October 2007 08:49 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] deckardcanine.livejournal.com
Not lately. I was prompted to type this after a not-so-serious portion of my newspaper misused the term "run-on sentence."
Date: Saturday, 13 October 2007 01:21 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] tabeal.livejournal.com
It seems inerrant to me.
Date: Saturday, 13 October 2007 08:49 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] deckardcanine.livejournal.com
It does, until you realize that it consists of two independent clauses separated only by a comma.

Profile

deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Thursday, 5 February 2026 10:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios