Thursday, 3 September 2009 10:35 am

(no subject)

deckardcanine: (Default)
[personal profile] deckardcanine
Man. First a black hole "bullies" a galaxy with a "punch," then a planet takes a "suicide" course (see last week's entry), and now I'm reading that Andromeda is a "cannibal."

Astronomers, do you need a hug?
Date: Thursday, 3 September 2009 03:08 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] nefaria.livejournal.com
The Andromeda - Milky Way collision seems to be the most nearly certain end of the human race. Unless we can travel the featureless, million-light-year gaps between galaxies by then, we're toast. Extra crispy toast.
Date: Friday, 4 September 2009 11:33 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] thatcatgirl.livejournal.com
Astronomers totally need a hug. Imagine: science geeks who study things incredibly sparse and vast... Many of whom have at least spent some time had the lonely task of manning a telescope all night long. And on top of that they can't even play with what they study! (My physics prof pointed that last bit out to me as a reason for Astrophysicists to be a bit...off, but I think it would apply to Astronomers also, even if they aren't physicists).
Date: Saturday, 5 September 2009 01:17 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] deckardcanine.livejournal.com
You know, I read that astronomers are more likely than psychologists to be theists, probably because there's more obvious "perfection" in celestial bodies than in humans. But our "ideals" for celestial bodies are broader. And like most things in nature, they ought not to be a serious clue for how we should behave. I would not be surprised if many theistic astronomers were essentially pantheists like Einstein.

Profile

deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, 6 February 2026 04:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios