Saturday, 19 September 2009 12:27 pm
(no subject)
Okay, I need some clarity here. On one forum, more than one person has a different understanding of the word "lie" from mine. I've always thought that a lie was a deliberate untruth. They think it's any untruth. My dictionaries back me up, but if enough people come to think differently, later editions will change the definition.
What do you think? I'd much prefer to keep the more specific meaning as possible, lest an accusation of "lies" be taken the wrong way.
What do you think? I'd much prefer to keep the more specific meaning as possible, lest an accusation of "lies" be taken the wrong way.
no subject
no subject
Also, the problem of willful ignorance and choosing to believe things in the face of contrary evidence muddies the waters of what is "deliberate".
no subject
To insist that any falsehood is a lie makes a liar out of the entire world's population, because all of us believe and relate things that may not necessarily be true, simply because we have incorrect information.
no subject
It's a deep philosophical question, no easy answer available as far as I can tell.
no subject
A lie is deliberate, it seems to me. A simply lie is asserting something when you believe the opposite to be true.
A more complex lie is intentionally causing the other person to believe something falsely, even if you did not say it. That one often lets people skate away from it. This is often called a more "artful" way to lie.
Perhaps the best version of it is to state the truth in such a way that a person believes the opposite, taking cues from your behavior (and his own) instead of the actual statements. That is the most artful of all, perhaps; it allows an "I told you so!"
===|==============/ Level Head
"Lies"