Thursday, 3 April 2014 04:49 pm

(no subject)

deckardcanine: (Venice fox mask)
[personal profile] deckardcanine
Much as I respect the Bechdel test, if only for calling attention to the relative marginalization of ladies in cinema, I've grown dissatisfied with its binary pass-fail system. The Bechdel Test Movie List goes a step further with symbols to indicate which criteria, if any, the given movies fail to meet. But if you haven't committed those symbols to memory, their meaning is not immediately evident. I still don't get the inspiration for the third one.

I hereby propose a numerical scale, possibly to be depicted with rows of filled or empty stars like Netflix ratings (or perhaps female signs instead):

0 = There are no women.
1 = There is exactly one woman.
2 = There are two or more women, but they never talk to each other.
3 = Two or more women talk to each other, but never about anything besides a man.
4 = Two or more women talk a little, once or twice, about something other than a man. In other words, it just barely passes the Bechdel test.
5 = Two or more women talk multiple times or for a long time about something other than a man. In other words, it easily passes the Bechdel test.

In cases where the distinction is ambiguous, we can put in a half star.

While we're at it, let's replace "women" with "female characters" and "man" with "male character(s)," because why should only adults matter? I'd also consider adding "major," by which I mean important enough to mention in a synopsis, so female extras don't make the difference in the lower scores.

Profile

deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 3 February 2026 12:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios