Sunday, 4 May 2014 02:18 pm

Racism or Prizism?

deckardcanine: (Venice fox mask)
[personal profile] deckardcanine
In the latest Entertainment Weekly, Mark Harris has a column complaining about how rare it is for even vastly praised Black actresses (or maybe Black actors in general; he doesn't put much emphasis on gender) to get good movie roles. It's not a bad article, yet I'm not convinced that the examples he gives stem mainly from the source he believes.

I don't deny that show business is a bastion of ongoing racism and sexism, subtle or otherwise. After all, you can legitimately turn down actors just for the way they look, regardless of skills. Even with modern technology, cosmetic procedures, and high budgets, no sane casting director will consider, say, Lupita Nyong'o and Daniel Day-Lewis for the same part, whatever that may be. And it's almost inevitable that minorities will be less in demand.

But Nyong'o, the primary focus of Harris's article, has more standing in the way than her dark skin and exotic name. There's the Oscar curse -- or rather an Oscar curse, since the term gets applied to more than one phenomenon. I'm talking about how actors who win Academy Awards when they weren't previously all that famous have trouble landing good roles afterward. It's not just a superstition or an arbitrary long-time statistical pattern; it happens because companies have a hard time seeing those actors in any roles unlike what they won for. There weren't many masters of ceremonies for Joel Grey after Cabaret; Louise Fletcher couldn't keep playing harsh nurses after One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest; and Jean Dujardin, for all his popularity in early 2012, never takes center stage anymore and thus remains largely silent on screen. The curse doesn't always strike (I doubt Day-Lewis was a household name before My Left Foot), but it strikes often enough that I fully expected the difficulties of both Dujardin and Nyong'o. And had Quvenzhané Wallis won in her single digits for Beasts of the Southern Wild, she'd be on her way to the next Tatum O'Neal.

Harris also mentions Viola Davis and Halle Berry as undersupported Black actresses. Well, I for one could not have placed Davis before The Help (I'd seen her only in bit parts), so the Oscar curse may well have hit her too. Berry seems to be another story: Harris notes that she made bad choices but has been given less of a chance to recover than White actors. That puts aside how many embarrassments Eddie Murphy made before garnering an Oscar nomination for Dreamgirls. I suspect it's largely a matter of overall history.

On the other hand, Harris sees more progress in the realm of TV. At least, that's what he implies, providing only "Scandal" and an upcoming CBS drama (which he doesn't name, but IMDb lists "Extant") as examples. I am vaguely aware of subcultural differences between TV and movies, but let me know when you come up with more evidence. Perhaps it simply takes more than a one-page article to present a compelling case on the matter.
Date: Friday, 23 May 2014 12:32 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] level-head.livejournal.com
A friend of mind is an extremely talented editor, and I'd have thought that he would cringe at your proper-casing the simple adjective "black." Except, of course, that he is you. Is this accidental racism springing from political correctness?

Hollywood is left-dominated, and thus racism and sexism (and most particularly ideologism, if I may perhaps coin a word) are quite prevalent.

One friend of mine, a black actor with decades of roles in TV and movies, has a very hard time finding roles because he "doesn't sound black enough." In the Hollywood conception, a black actor, even if he is playing a neurology student who has never had time to be a street thug and has been buried in studies all his life, must sound like a street thug to be "authentic." Joseph wrote a book on this topic: He sound like a white boy (Joseph C. Phillips).

But if you're a conservative, and do not yet have a level of "write your own ticket" prestige in Hollywood, you had damned better stay in the closet. The anti-conservative ideologism is rank indeed.

One place that had been an exception is Pixar. They've had voice actors who were avowed and vocal communists playing against voice actors who were famously activist conservatives. (Rex and Hamm, respectively, in the Toy Story series are examples of this.) To be fair, these two actors were not directly working together as the voices are recorded separately.

I enjoyed spending time with conservative John Ratzenberger, but an evening of conversation with the poisonous Wallace Shawn would be "inconceivable!" I've seen people argue "Oh, but he says he's only a socialist!" He says this, in his role as a darling of the leftist elite, but less visibly he's perfectly happy to go to communism conventions and perform readings of the Communist Manifesto and lecture on other Communist topics. He'd love to see America dead, and replaced by something made in the Communist image. But in Hollywood, of course, this gets him celebrated as "egdy!" and "avant garde!"

Happy birthday, my friend, and may your job situation be resolved happily and quickly.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
Date: Friday, 23 May 2014 02:10 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] deckardcanine.livejournal.com
Capitalized "Black" and "White" are prescribed in some editorial styles. I go with it in general because (1) very few of us are literally black or white and (2) capitals seem to put us on an even footing with Asians, Hispanics/Latinos, and American Indians.

"Ideologism" already exists as a word with another meaning. "Creedism" may be better, unusual as it is.

I can think of some Black actors who don't sound much like it. They all play nerds.

Now I wonder if I'll hate My Dinner with Andre.

Profile

deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 3 February 2026 02:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios