Wednesday, 29 November 2006 05:29 pm

(no subject)

deckardcanine: (Default)
[personal profile] deckardcanine
I take interest whenever I hear of evidence of a continuing trend in racism, sexism, or a similar ism. In a way, knowing about them gives me a perverse kind of pleasure, like I can use it as a comeback for those who seem to think we've advanced enough socially.

Many of the trends that I've heard about in the last couple years have connections to show business, which is hardly surprising when you consider that certain roles pretty much require a given racial appearance, etc. The "Hollywood White-Out" may have declined -- at least, I haven't heard about it since 2000 -- but there are still many movies with a Magic Negro, a flawless, pastless Black character who exists chiefly to help a White character with self-realization (Peter Jackson's King Kong, anyone?). These days, a non-White actor who doesn't request otherwise typically is given a costar of a different race in order to tell the audience that it's not just a "Black film" or whatnot. Black men (but not women) almost never get sex scenes, presumably because White men feel threatened by a show of that kind of power, or else they just think it's gross. There's a coolest man in the world most of the time (presently George Clooney), but women always have to settle for being the hottest at best. The masses are largely to blame for these iniquities; producers just go along with them.

I bring this up now because I'm not sure what to make of what I saw in the Express two days ago. The article is called "Love Can Reeeeally Hurt," subtitled "Your handy guide to getting it on without permanent injuries." (No, I am not opposed to such articles being buried in a free family newspaper.) The accompanying photo shows a dark brown man's chest and abs with a fair-skinned hand clutching them. Are they using diversity for maximum demographic appeal? Was it the sexiest male torso with the sexiest feminine hand they could find? Or is it a subtle suggestion that a Black man having sex with a White woman is a recipe for disaster? That is traditionally the most despised pairing, is it not? Think back a few weeks to the notorious attack ad on Harold Ford....

Eh, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. So far, there haven't been any letters to the editor on anything connected with the article.
Date: Sunday, 14 January 2007 03:23 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] level-head.livejournal.com
I just now caught it. "Mutilation" -- not "maniplation". Arrgh.

===|==============/ Level Head
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2007 09:32 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] ruediix.livejournal.com
I know what you meant. Surgical Manipulation of any external body part is mutilating.

I don't think any modern person male or female would object to female genital manipulation. :) Sex would be pretty painful for most women without proper foreplay.

Another surgical manipulation I object to that a lot of other people don't is cosmetic surgery and cosmetic dentistry. That is, of course, excluding reconstructive variety.

It really sickens me that they are wasting skin from tissue donors on these people's vanity. That skin should be used to correct massive scaring on burn patients.

Profile

deckardcanine: (Default)
Stephen Gilberg

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sunday, 8 February 2026 09:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios